How scholars spend their time

How scholars spend their time

Image result for student
These data show how scholars used their time at different types of university in the period 2012 to 2015
At the most research-intensive universities (defined as those in the top decile for total research funding received), academics spend more than half their time on research, double the proportion spent at younger universities.
Scholars at younger universities prioritise teaching, but also have a larger administrative burden than elsewhere (a quarter of academic time versus a fifth at older and research-intensive universities).
At all types of institution, knowledge exchange plays second fiddle to other tasks.
The data come from a survey of more than 18,000 academics by the National Centre for Universities and Business, entitled .
As reported in last week’s Times Higher Education, it found that a dwindling number of academics were commercialising their work.
Spending on UK higher education rises by 6%

Spending on UK higher education rises by 6%

Tuition fee income increases sharply as funding council cash declines, latest sector-level data shows Spending on UK higher education providers increased by 6 per cent in 2014-15 to £31.2 billion, new figures show.
Details of the latest increase – worth around £1.8 billion in total – were released by the Higher Education Statistics Agency, which indicates the sector's total income grew even faster.
Some £33.2 billion in income was received by UK higher education in the last full academic year, up from £30.7 billion in 2013-14, an 8.1 per cent rise, the latest Hesa information published on 28 April shows.
That came despite a reduction in income from funding council grants, which accounted for £5.3 billion in 2014-15 (17.2 per cent of total income) compared with £6.1 billion (19.8 per cent of total income) in 2013-14.
Monies from tuition fees and education contracts (£15.6 billion) were significantly up on 2013-14 (£13.7 billion) – with just over a quarter of this (27 per cent) coming from international students (£4.2 billion).
International fee income accounted for 12.7 per cent of the sector’s income – the same proportion as in 2013-14, though the total income was 8 per cent higher in actual terms (£3.9 billion was raised in 2013-14).
Income from research grants and contracts (£5.9 billion) is now more than that awarded by funding councils (£5.3 billion), which just five years ago were the largest source of funding for higher education (handing out 33.7 per cent of all income in 2009-10).
The total amount of money received from European Union sources was £836 million (2.5 per cent of all higher education income) compared with £789 million in 2013-14 (2.6 per cent).
On expenditure, some 55 per cent of money went on staff costs (£17.1 billion) compared with £16.3 billion in 2013-14 (55 .4 per cent).
Some £3.6 billion was spent on university premises and £1.6 billion on residences and catering operations.
Hefce
Source: 
HESA: HE Finance Plus 2014/15, published on 28 April 2016
Grant winners – 28 April 2016

Grant winners – 28 April 2016

Image result for grant winners

Medical Research Council

Research grants
An alcohol brief intervention (ABI) for male remand prisoners: an MRC complex intervention framework development and feasibility study

Supportive supervision of mid-level health workers in rural Nepal for improved job satisfaction, motivation and quality of care

Economic and Social Research Council

Research grants
Making philanthropy developmentally effective

Using “naturalistic dual-EEG” to measure mother-infant brain-to-brain (b2b) synchrony in socially mediated learning

National Environment Research Council

ICE-IMPACT: International consortium for the exploitation of infrared measurements of polar climate

Innovate UK HitClean high temperature inspection and cleaning by advanced ultrasonics for effective maintenance and management of oil and gas offshore

Leverhulme Trust

Research Project Grants
Sciences
Silicate mineral inclusions and the composition of new continental crust

Neural and cognitive mechanisms of multimodal working memory

Reduced complexity finite element methods

Santorini: high-resolution imaging of an active volcano with 3D full-waveform inversion

In detail

Humanities
Award winners: Robert Jones and Martyn Powell
Institutions: University of Leeds and Aberystwyth University
Value: £272,621
The political works of Richard Brinsley Sheridan
This project will investigate the dramatist, theatre-owner and politician Richard Brinsley Sheridan, who was more notoriously known as a spin doctor, drinker and debtor. Sheridan was a politician for nearly three decades. This study is a reappraisal of his career, exploring his national and international significance as a politician and orator, and his wider political activity – such as his journalistic writing. Sheridan, on account of his excellent oratorical skills, which made his speeches popular among newspaper editors, served as progenitor for the “spin doctor”. The project will culminate in the publication of a four-volume edition of his complete political works.
The week in higher education – 28 April 2016

The week in higher education – 28 April 2016

Image result for phd
The good, the bad and the offbeat: the academy through the lens of the world's media History PhD student Hannah Woods was the winning captain in last week’s University Challengefinal, but attention has bizarrely focused not on her quizzing prowess but on her naturally arched left eyebrow. Woods’ so-called Roger Moore eyebrow spawned two parody Twitter accounts, a Valentine Day’s card and an online marriage proposal during Peterhouse College, Cambridge's run to the final, The Daily Telegraph reported  on 18 April. Ms Woods explained that her face was naturally asymmetric, saying that her left brow “tends to float ever-higher up [her] face”, giving the appearance that she was “rather wry and challenging”. But she added that she was "slightly baffled by the level of eyebrow attention – I’ve found it all quite funny, though I tend to agree with the people who have asked ‘is this news?’”.

Students from several universities have threatened to split from the National Union of Students after the election of Malia Bouattia as president. Harry Samuels, an NUS delegate from theUniversity of Oxfordtold the BBC’s Newsnight on 21 April that Ms Bouattia’s appointment was undemocratic, as she was not elected under a system of “one member, one vote”. Ms Bouattia has been accused of making anti-Semitic remarks – including calling the University of Birmingham “something of a Zionist outpost” in 2011. While the move to disaffiliate was “not just about Malia in particular…her election enshrines the fact that the NUS no longer represents all students”, said Mr Samuels. Ms Bouattia has said that she is "extremely uncomfortable with insinuations of anti-Semitism", adding: “For me to take issue with Zionist politics is not me taking issue with being Jewish." She said that it was "a political argument, not one of faith”, adding that she had a “long track record of opposing racism and discrimination in all its forms and actively campaigning against it”.

Students at an elite Paris university have been criticised for asking people to wear a Muslim headscarf for a day to help them understand Islamophobia. The event at Sciences Po follows comments by French prime minister Manuel Valls calling on universities to ban the hijab on campus, in line with France’s strict policy of state secularism, The Guardian reported on 20 April. Organisers of the Sciences Po initiative claimed that it would help “demystify” the headscarf, but the move was attacked by some staff and student groups as a “provocation”. “So when is there going to be a sharia day? Or stoning day? Or slavery day?”, tweeted Bernard-Henri Lévy, a writer and philosopher, while Bruno Le Maire, a former agriculture minister and Sciences Po professor, wrote of his disapproval at so-called Hijab Day. “In France, women are visible. No proselytising!” he said.

The potential for a PhD to massively increase earning power was at the heart of a shocking court case that left a couple “devastated” and financially ruined, BBC News reported on 20 April. Frank and Marilyn Boardman agreed to support their daughter, Nicola, through a PhD at the University of Oxford after she told them that she would make £3 million from her subsequent career and pay them back. But Boardman, from Truro, Cornwall, who had a history of battling heroin addiction, had not been accepted for any study and cheated her parents out of £250,000 over the course of four years, in which they paid for “university trips” to Greece and Mongolia. “This was all made up,” said Philip Lee, prosecuting, shortly before Boardman was jailed for three years and four months, after pleading guilty to one count of fraud at Truro Crown Court. Tragically, the couple sold their home to support their daughter’s supposed studies, leaving them with no funds for their retirement.

Jo Johnson, the universities and science minister, has warned that Brexit could create a “science and innovation crisis”. Mr Johnson, an enthusiastic advocate for the European Union in contrast to his brother Boris, spoke in London on 21 April to pose the question: “Are we going to preserve the factors that have created a great tech cluster, or succumb to fanciful Brexit bluster?” His speech added, with more bizarre rhymes: “Do we want to fuel our knowledge economy with science and innovation, or fill it up with piffle and ventilation?” The word “piffle” has an interesting Johnsonian heritage: Boris used it to criticise David Cameron’s “broken society” comments in 2008 and in his 2004 denial of allegations that he had an extramarital affair – a denial that eventually saw him sacked from the Conservative opposition front bench.
REF should include all academics, says University of Cambridge

REF should include all academics, says University of Cambridge


The University of Cambridge has proposed a “radical” shake-up of the research excellence framework (REF) so that every academic, even those on teaching-only contracts, would be submitted to the assessment exercise.
The future shape of the REF, currently being reviewed, is being fought over by UK universities, with Cambridge’s ideas perhaps the most controversial yet.
At the moment, departments can choose to submit any number of researchers to the REF, which Cambridge says is to blame for much of the gaming that occurs during the process.
“All academic staff, irrespective of whether their contracts are teaching-only, research-only or both, should be returned. This would have the twin benefits of increasing the accuracy and integrity of the exercise and significantly reducing its cost,” says the university’s submission to the review.
“If the staff return is restricted to staff with a research element in their contracts there is a risk that institutions alter employment contracts of their academic staff to enable particular individuals to be included or excluded,” it says. “This can be hugely detrimental for those staff who have been excluded.”
It also proposes scrapping a limit of four papers per researcher as this “discriminates against highly-productive, world-leading researchers”.
The university also supports looking at an institution’s overall research performance rather than assessing it at a more granular level, echoing the view of the Russell Group, of which it is a member.
“Cambridge proposes radical change to the current REF model with a move to a process of institutional research evaluation. Cambridge considers that the totality of an institution’s research output must be considered a key element of the evaluation of its research quality and environment,” it says.
This view has already been criticised by the University Alliance of younger institutions, which generally receive less money from the REF, as it would risk handing even more resources to universities that already do well, and potentially ignoring pockets of excellence in less research-intensive universities.
The current review of the REF is being led by Lord Stern, president of the British Academy, and is expected to report in the summer. 
Undergraduates 'poorly prepared for PhDs'

Undergraduates 'poorly prepared for PhDs'

Image result for phd
Undergraduate courses are not properly equipping students to pursue doctorates, meaning that many undertaking PhDs are “less confident” than those in past cohorts, a conference has heard.
Alison Hodge, professor of engineering leadership at Aston University, made the warning as universities prepare for a new government loan scheme that could help more students to enter doctoral study.
Undergraduate programmes “have been quite heavily structured”, she told delegates at a conference in London on 7 April. Course leaders have tried to encourage “independence” among undergraduates, but students are nonetheless “less confident, less standalone when they embark on PhDs”, than in the past, she said.
Later during the conference, she added: “With the expansion in numbers there are more people going into PhDs than perhaps were formerly”. But not all of these have the independence, self-reliance and “slightly rebellious” streak needed to get through a doctorate, Professor Hodge warned.
More students believe – having done well at undergraduate level – that they can “sail through” a PhD using the same ways of working, she argued. The conference heard that a sizeable minority of PhD students still start a doctorate without studying a master’s first.
Asked whether she agreed with Professor Hodge, Clare Jones, a senior careers advisor for research staff and students at the University of Nottingham, said: “I do think there is a bigger difference [now] between being on an undergraduate programme and then moving through to a PhD”.
New PhD students “need to get hold of the fact very quickly that they are working differently”, she said.
A total of 12.8 per cent of research degree students in England will end up leaving without a qualification within seven years, according to projections by the Higher Education Council for England (Hefce) relating to those who started a doctorate in 2010-11. However, this is a very slight improvement on earlier cohorts.
In March's Budget, it was confirmed that from 2018-19 doctoral students will be able to take on a £25,000 loan to help cover the cost of a PhD.
Steven Hill, Hefce’s head of research policy, told the event, Next Steps for Postgraduate Research: Funding, Quality of Provision and the High-Skilled Workforce, organised by the Westminster Higher Education Forum, that this sum would not cover the full living and fees cost of a PhD. Many students would therefore still need to find other sources of funding.
Dr Hill added that 56 per cent of postgraduate research students now enter with a master’s qualification, a figure that had been increasing in recent years.
Princeton keeps Woodrow Wilson’s name despite protests

Princeton keeps Woodrow Wilson’s name despite protests


Princeton University has announced that its Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs will continue to bear the name of the 28th president, despite protests by student activists seeking to rename the school because of Wilson's record on racial issues, writes David Wright for CNN.

In a press release, Princeton's board of trustees called for “an expanded and more vigorous commitment to diversity and inclusion at Princeton” – but stopped short of renaming the school.

“The trustees accepted the committee's recommendation that the school of public and international affairs and the undergraduate residential college that bear Wilson's name should continue to do so,” they wrote of the former president who had once served as Princeton's president. “But that the university also must be 'honest and forthcoming about its history' and transparent 'in recognising Wilson's failings and shortcomings as well as the visions and achievements that led to the naming of the school and the college in the first place’.”
Full report on the CNN site

New infrastructure programme for universities, colleges

New infrastructure programme for universities, colleges


Image result for canada University
Canada’s Minister of Science Kirsty Duncan announced last week that the government would launch the application process for a CAN$2 billion (US$1.5 billion) fund that will improve research and innovation infrastructure at universities and colleges across the country, reports Marketwired.

Announced in Budget 2016, the Post-Secondary Institutions Strategic Investment Fund will enhance and modernise research facilities on Canadian campuses and improve the environmental sustainability of these facilities. Consultation with the provinces and territories as well as work to implement the initiative as quickly as possible are already under way.

The targeted, short-term investments under the fund will promote economic activity across Canada and help Canada's universities and colleges develop highly skilled workers, act as engines of discovery and collaborate on innovations that help Canadian companies compete and grow internationally.
Full report on the Marketwired site

150 best young universities in the world

Switzerland’s École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne has topped the Times Higher Education 150 Under 50 Rankings 2016 – a ranking of the best universities under the age of 50 – for the second year in a row, while the United Kingdom has the most world-class young institutions in the top 150, writes Ellie Bothwell for Times Higher Education.

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne held on to pole position in the table despite fierce competition from universities in East Asia. Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University, founded just 25 years ago, came second, making it Asia’s top young institution for the first time in the ranking’s five-year history. This follows Singapore’s success in last year’s Times Higher Education World University Rankings, in which the National University of Singapore was crowned Asia’s best university.

The rest of the top five in the young universities list was filled by Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the Netherlands’ Maastricht University and South Korea’s Pohang University of Science and Technology in third, fourth and fifth place, respectively.
Full report on the Times Higher Education site
Lifelong learning units for all public universities

Lifelong learning units for all public universities

All five public universities in Singapore will this year set up dedicated units to help citizens learn new skills throughout their lives as part of the SkillsFuture programme, it was announced last week, writes Medha Basu for Govinsider.
Image result for best universities

The five universities are the National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Technology and Design, and the Singapore Institute of Technology. The new units will help universities prepare themselves to deliver new kinds of courses to mid-career citizens, through shorter courses, more online training and creating deeper ties with employers.

“A key focus of these centres will be to look beyond traditional degree offerings, by offering shorter, bite-sized certificate programmes,” said Ong Ye Kun, Acting Minister for Education (Higher Education and Skills), in his Committee of Supply speech. “The purpose is not to offer part-time degrees or masters programmes to fuel the paper chase, but to help workers stay relevant and competitive,” he added.
Full report on the Govinsider site 

Student admissions criteria to widen beyond grades

Student admissions criteria to widen beyond grades

Polytechnics and universities will have more room to admit students based on their talents and interests rather than just grades, under enhancements to current aptitude-based admission schemes, writes Laura Elizabeth Philomin for Today Online.

At the polytechnics, the Direct Polytechnic Admissions, or DPA, intake allowance will be raised to 12.5% from the current 2.5%, and the scheme will be renamed the Early Admissions Exercise, beginning from the 2017 academic year intake. At the university level, Nanyang Technological University, National University of Singapore and Singapore Management University will be able to admit up to 15% of their annual intake under the Discretionary Admissions Scheme – up from the current 10%. It will also begin with the 2017 academic year cohort.

Announcing this during the Ministry of Education’s Committee of Supply debate, Acting Education Minister (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung said studies by the ministry had shown that among students with similar O-Level aggregate scores, those admitted to polytechnics through the DPA do better in their studies and are more likely to continue in careers in the sectors they were trained for.
Full report on the Today Online site